European and Turkish voices in favour and against Turkish accession to the European Union
Read Online

European and Turkish voices in favour and against Turkish accession to the European Union

  • 554 Want to read
  • ·
  • 70 Currently reading

Published by P.I.E. Peter Lang in Bruxelles, New York .
Written in English


  • European Union -- Turkey,
  • Europe -- Economic integration

Book details:

Edition Notes

Includes index.

StatementChristiane Timmerman, Dirk Rochtus & Sara Mels (eds.).
SeriesEuropean policy -- no. 38
ContributionsTimmerman, Christiane., Rochtus, Dirk, 1961-, Mels, Sara.
LC ClassificationsHC241.25.T9 E87 2008
The Physical Object
Paginationp. cm.
ID Numbers
Open LibraryOL17032358M
ISBN 109789052014289
LC Control Number2008034256

Download European and Turkish voices in favour and against Turkish accession to the European Union


European and Turkish Voices in Favour and Against Turkish Accession to the European Union Article in South European Society and Politics 15(2) . European and Turkish voices in favour and against Turkish accession to the European Union. By. Abstract. In the book several authors from Western European countries and Turkey discuss the socio-economic, historical, cultural and political arguments in favour and against Turkish s: status: publishe.   EU parliament votes overwhelmingly in favour of scrapping Turkey accession talks A sign displays the words "Bon Voyage" and the stars of the European Union as well as many Turkish . Turkey is negotiating its accession to the European Union (EU) as a member state, following its application to accede to the European Economic Community, the predecessor of the EU, on 14 April After the ten founding members, Turkey was one of the first countries to become a member of the Council of Europe in The country was also an associate member of the Western European Union.

1 “Europeanization of Industrial Relations”, which focuses primarily on the changing relations of st ; 4 It is the aim of this paper, then, to analyze developments in one such regional formation, the European Union (EU), regarding the possible ways of improving labor’s conditions. The EU offers a good case for observing regional level developments and their impact on labor relations. Moustakis () postulates that, the European Union considers expansion as an accomplishment which will bring regional stability to Europe. With regard to accession procedure, there is a criterion that guides EU membership; this includes values of stable institutions, democratic state, .   While the European institutions signaled their positions on the Turkish political situation and its possible impact on the future of Turkey’s accession process to the EU, diverging positions among member states—both in terms of how to continue the process as well as actions to be taken—became especially visible. It is time for advocates of Turkey`s EU membership to take off the rose-coloured glasses and look at the facts. In light of the current conflict in several neighbour countries of Turkey and the economic and confidence crisis in many EU member states, the promotion of Turkey`s EU accession is not only short-sighted, but dangerous.

In this paper, we analyze the Bulgarian and Turkish accession negotiations to the European Union based on propositions derived from different theoretical frameworks. In order to do so, we first analyze the Turkish and the Bulgarian ability to fulfill the EU’s political criteria, and . Turkey wants to join the European Union, but the nation bloc has mixed feelings about the partnership. DW looks at which member states favor Turkish accession, which ones don't and why. would you be in favour or against it becoming part of the European Union in the future?” Respondents could respond with either “in favour,” “against,” or “don’t know.” Turkish Accession to the European Union: Shaped by Perception or.   No other case of European Union (EU) enlargement has provoked as much contention on a European-wide scale as has the prospective membership of Turkey in the EU, and none has involved as much complexity in its different layers and justifications, which range from security concerns to considerations of economic costs and benefits to geopolitical and cultural issues (see Sjursen, .